Search for: "State v. House"
Results 7681 - 7700
of 28,802
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2008, 7:09 pm
Texas or Kansas v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:46 am
Assembly Bill 1307 AB 1307, unanimously passed by the State Legislature and signed by Governor Newsom on September 7, 2023, was crafted in response to the court ruling in Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 9:24 pm
The 6-3 decision in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 7:01 am
Johnson v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:41 am
Musk and Jarndyce v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:44 pm
After a search of the applicant’s family house was conducted, the police indicated the applicant – and not his father – as a suspect. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 2:56 pm
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:42 am
Four cases in the House of Lords or Supreme Court’ at [17] ff. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 11:26 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied the requested temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, and in a case titled Fulton v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:50 am
” Lapin v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
Mathis eventually met Jarvis again and, after having a meal, Mathis took Jarvis to Mathis's house. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 12:43 pm
In Kuvin v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 1:19 pm
Liaw v Sohal. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 4:50 am
State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 11:32 am
United States. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 6:39 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:30 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 11:58 am
Griesbach on a pending suppression motion in United States v. [read post]
