Search for: "State v. House"
Results 7681 - 7700
of 28,802
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm
It provides a shield for individuals from arbitrary state action. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:51 pm
The House of Representatives, now controlled by the Democrats, also filed its opening brief in the case on Monday. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 11:35 am
§11133(a)(7)(B)(v). [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:17 am
v=4K5fbQ1-zps Some took 16 steps forward, some took zero, I took four (but not for the stuff in parentheses). [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
In September 2004, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland wrote to Mrs Finucane and on 23 September made a statement in the House of Commons to the effect that the inquiry would be held on the basis of new legislation which was to be introduced shortly: the Inquiries Act 2005. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:29 am
, Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 11:45 pm
” The post State Redistricting Under Gaffney v Cummings appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:23 pm
United States, is still good law. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm
” State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 9:04 am
A court ruled that “stop-and-frisk” violated the Fourth Amendment in Floyd v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:08 am
House of Representatives entirely away from the state legislatures. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
See Chambers v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:22 am
And where it is the state gathering and using this material there is a pretty good chance that it isn't lawful at all (parents need not panic this applies to situations where social workers are looking at and gathering data about private individuals). [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm
Last month, the SCOTUS ruled in Timbs v Indiana that a state's fine or forfeiture scheme may be excessive and thus unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 8:26 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:48 pm
Here are some highlights from this week’s innocence-related media: A Racial Pattern So Obvious, Even the Supreme Court Might See ItFlowers v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:47 pm
Indiana Case In Tyson Timbs v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:29 pm
The Supreme Court affirmed as much in its 2015 decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 11:21 am
The court heard argument this week in: Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:22 am
The issue could return to the Supreme Court; the Court’s prior ruling in the Virginia case, Williams v. [read post]
