Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 7681 - 7700
of 29,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2019, 8:35 am
" There is very little case law that guides this issue, but the Second Circuit relies on United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 10:09 am
Rojas v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 5:32 am
Coulibaly v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:15 am
The 1997 PDRS was in use, and it specifically stated that its MDT was intended as a guide only. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
V. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
Disqualifying applicants for a particular job EEOC v Woodbridge Corp., CA8, 263 F.3d 812Mathews v The Denver Post, CA10, 2001 WL 967797 The Woodbridge and Mathews cases concern similar issues: disqualifying an individual with a disability for a particular job or assignment. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:01 pm
”In addition, Thomas argued that allowing federal courts to overturn a state prisoner’s conviction and sentence was an “intru[sion] on state sovereignty … [that] overrides the State’s sovereign power to enforce societal norms through criminal law. [read post]
CAFA’s Local Event Exception Does Not Constrain the Event or Occurrence to a Discrete Moment in Time
12 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
” International Paper relied on Allen v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:27 am
A recent Court of Appeals decision, State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:06 am
Circuit’s recent private delegation decision involving Amtrak, the Fourth Circuit’s recent antitrust ruling regarding the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners, and the Supreme Court’s recent state-action antitrust immunity decision in FTC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
To the extent that the state court based its conclusion on the IQ score of 75, the Court cited Hall v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:29 am
LLC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:20 am
LTD v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:50 am
In the state of Alabama, the legal BAC level is 0.08. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 4:40 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 8:15 pm
The Court went further in R. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 3:33 am
Regarding damages, “to survive a … pre-answer dismissal motion, a pleading need only state allegations from which damages attributable to the defendant’s conduct [or nonfeasance] may be reasonably inferred” (Lappin v Greenberg, 34 AD3d 277, 279 [1st Dept 2006] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 9:02 am
Sebelius (opinion downloads as a pdf), ruling the Affordable Health Care Act constitutional, or the 2013 cases, United States v. [read post]
