Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 7681 - 7700
of 36,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2016, 4:53 pm
Duke Power Co., 401 US 424 (1971). [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
In Chevalier v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:06 am
Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 6:40 am
First State Insurance Co. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:54 pm
The reasoning of the CJEU in GAT v LuK was equally applicable here. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 7:04 am
Pereira v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm
In the matter of Murphy v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am
On Wednesday, in State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:49 am
In Miller v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:46 pm
The Roberts opinion joins McCulloch v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
The City of San Diego suing San Diego State University?! [read post]
21 May 2025, 6:21 am
A US federal judge ruled on Monday that President Donald Trump had “no constitutional authority” to fire staff and terminate programmatic activities at the US Institute of Peace (USIP) (United States Inst. of Peace v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 10:39 pm
Many states still completely outlaw it. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:26 pm
In Boumediene v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 6:31 am
In Met v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
" Nothing in the decision called into question the "broad power" of States to regulate acts undertaken with some mens rea. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:02 am
The decision to withdraw or not – the decision whether to give notice under the applicable EU treaty – is for Parliament to make, not the party in power in Parliament; aka the “gov’t” or the Crown. [111] for the reasons we have set out, we hold the Secretary of State does not have power under the Crown’s prerogative to give notice pursuant to Article 50 of the TEU for the United Kingdom to withdraw from the European Union. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Mary Ziegler In his concurring opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:20 pm
It has now been almost two full years since the Supreme Court, in Boumediene v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:04 am
In its May 2022 ruling in United States v. [read post]
