Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 7681 - 7700 of 57,126
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Arnold Plant said the case for monopoly can’t be justified on the basis that the profits of monopoly will go to desireable things. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" However, said the Commissioner, the "does not affect my conclusion that petitioners’ claims here — such as the disparate impact of hiring practices like “word of mouth” referrals – are more appropriately resolved by a fair employment practice agency or a court of competent jurisdiction," citing Grant v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 635 F2d 1007. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" However, said the Commissioner, the "does not affect my conclusion that petitioners’ claims here — such as the disparate impact of hiring practices like “word of mouth” referrals – are more appropriately resolved by a fair employment practice agency or a court of competent jurisdiction," citing Grant v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 635 F2d 1007. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 2:58 pm by Josh Blackman
Indeed, Charles Lavine, the state Assembly Judiciary Committee Chair, said there would still be a purpose to impeach Cuomo: "there would be the opportunity in the court of impeachment to prohibit him from ever occupying statewide office. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:44 pm
  As I was reading Part II of the opinion, I often said to myself:  "Okay, this all makes sense, but it's also sort of silly. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:41 am by Eugene Volokh
And in his deposition, Plaintiff stated that when he handed his license and permit to Defendant, he said, "That's my license and including [sic] my pistol permit, I have a pistol on me. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 6:34 pm by Jackie O'Brien (AU)
      [1] Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 (Thaler). [2] Both the European Patents Office and the UK High Court have recently rejected patent applications naming DABUS as the inventor. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 6:34 pm by Jackie O'Brien (AU)
      [1] Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 (Thaler). [2] Both the European Patents Office and the UK High Court have recently rejected patent applications naming DABUS as the inventor. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:32 am by SW
    The Defendant refused the application, and by certificate issued on 17th June 2020 said the refusal was due to the request being “frivolous” under s.111(5) of the Magistrates Court Act 1980. [read post]