Search for: "State v. Self" Results 7681 - 7700 of 15,624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2016, 11:48 am by Orin Kerr
I’m also not sure it makes sense to apply the Franks v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
The only limitation spelled out in this OLC opinion was that the operations must be limited in duration and scope, so as not to rise to the level of a full-scale “war,” which only Congress can declare.16 This opinion broke new ground.17 It went far beyond any rationale of self-defense or imminent threat to justify the use of military force without an authorization from Congress. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
U.S.), and the second is a case about how readily a State can discriminate among messages on personalized automobile license plates (Walker v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
The state court agreed, and when the case was removed to federal district court (because the parties are citizens of different states), the federal court inherited the seal. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:53 am by Rachel Bercovitz
A D.C. federal district court judge ruled yesterday in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:32 am by Jay Stanley
The second memo, dated July 2012, is titled “Guidance Regarding the Application of United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
She also noted [at 50] that in Comic Enterprises Ltd v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
Supreme Court grants certiorari in District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 2:37 pm by Geoff Schweller
According to Kohn, the DFA requires that the SEC pays “related action” awards and clearly defines “related actions” as “‘any judicial or administrative action brought by’ the Justice Department, a ‘regulatory authority,’ a ‘self-regulatory organization,” or a state attorney in a criminal proceeding, that is ‘based on’ the ‘original information provided by a whistleblower’ to the SEC. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
Today, in the case challenging the constitutionality of Proposition 8 (Perry v. [read post]