Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 7681 - 7700 of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
He eventually brought his case to the Supreme Court, relying upon a law, 42 U.S.C. 1982, written and passed by Congress that says: "All citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every state and Territory, as is enjoyed by white citizens thereof to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 4:03 pm
Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center ATTN: CAP EXEMPT H-1B Processing Unit P.O. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
The Democratic National Committee attempted to take some of the pressure off of broadcasters by releasing a letter stating, among other things, that "Mr. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:13 am
"       Arguing for respondent United States, Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben began by emphasizing that the Court developed the McNabb-Mallory rule prior to Miranda, when there was no constitutional law requiring that suspects be advised of their rights. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 8:17 am by Ronald Mann
All three arguing counsel – Kathleen Sullivan for Samsung, Seth Waxman for Apple, and Brian Fletcher for the United States as a “friend of the court” – confirmed their acceptance of those points, and none of the justices seemed to have any hesitation in accepting them. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 4:51 am
" ¶ In its order in cause number 2005-M-01583-SCT dated August 16, 2005, this Court already ruled on DuPont's emergency petition for interlocutory appeal and motion for stay regarding the trial court's ruling to strike its experts, stating: Petitioner seeks relief from the trial court's order striking certain report and fact witnesses from participation in the trial scheduled for August 17, 2005. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:51 am by Bickford Blado & Botros
When this was later adopted by family law in the United States several years later, adjustments were made to turn spousal support into a somewhat punitive consequence. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am by Dennis Crouch
The focus of the case is location – and, what is meant by an "offer to sell . . . within the United States" under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 8:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
And, similarly, that enemy aliens resident outside the United States, even if they were civilians rather than combatants, had under prior law no right to access the nation’s courts during wartime. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:50 am by John J. Burke
Restani of the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) on August 4, 2010 ordered the United States Department of Commerce (“DOC”) to forego the imposition of countervailing duties on pneumatic off-the-road tires from the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Under the terms of his probation, the appellant was also prohibited from leaving the United States. [read post]