Search for: "mark"
Results 7681 - 7700
of 136,157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2008, 6:10 pm
" Boxes of "Mark's Quality Meats, Inc., BEEF FOR INDUSTRIAL USE ONLY, BEEF NY STRIPS. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:40 am
Some of the text included in the mark also appears in the description of the product, thereby connecting the goods to the mark. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 2:44 am
The USPTO issued a Section 2(e)(1) refusal of the mark MEAT CANDY, deeming the mark merely descriptive of "food kiosk services; mobile food kiosk services; mobile street vendor services featuring food and drink; street vendor services featuring food and drink. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:13 am
In re Adorama, Inc., Serial No. 97263050 (February 9, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Mark A. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 3:58 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of the word-and-design mark shown below, for "vermouth" in view of the registered mark PETRONI for "wine. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:00 pm
Theresa Earnhardt is the owner of trademark registrations and common law rights in the use of the mark DALE EARNHARDT. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 3:35 am
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark COLDTOUCH for "pillows, bed toppers" and "mattress pads," finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark COOL TOUCH (in standard character form) for "mattresses. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 3:21 am
Moreover, there was no evidence of usage of these third-party marks. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 4:04 am
The Board found the marks to be similar, noting that both marks suggest garments made of wool with "technical" or "technological" performance features. [read post]
24 May 2013, 2:27 am
Thus there was no doubt that the mark is misdescriptive, and deceptively so. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
Terminal Moraine Inc. dba Moraine Sales, Opposition No. 91250565 Opposition to registration of the mark DANA DESIGN in the form shown below, for backpacks, shoulder bags, and similar gear, on the grounds that the mark falsely suggests a connection with Dana Gleason, the owner of opposer, under Section 2(a), and the mark comprises the name of a living individual without his consent, under Section 2(c).] [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 3:16 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of the mark EQUIPOISE for "dietary supplements" in view of the registered mark AQUIPOISE for "health food supplements; vitamins; dietary and nutritional supplements; vitamin and mineral supplements. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 3:50 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark SmartDGA, in the design form shown below [SmartDGA disclaimed], for dissolved gas conditions monitors for electrical power transformers, on the ground that the mark is merely descriptive of the goods. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:35 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of NYMPHS OF CLARELLA in view of the registered mark THE NYMPH, both for wines. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 2:49 am
[Refusal to register the mark shown below left for "tax filing services," in view of the registered mark TRS in standard character and design form (below right) for tax advisory services.In re Mannatech, Inc., Serial No. 86447383 (August 17, 2016) [not precedential]. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 2:20 am
It has been said that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 7:14 am
Same as Peru, registration of collective trade marks in Argentina is free of charge. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 2:02 pm
The court was asked to decide whether the American artist Katy Perry was liable for trade mark infringement and whether the trade mark “KATIE PERRY” registration should be cancelled. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 5:56 am
September 15, 2014) [not precedential].Longshore, appearing pro se, argued that the marks are distinguishable because his mark depicts a dove whereas Retail Royalty's mark depicts a bird of prey. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:22 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark PLUM for various advisory and consulting services, including mortgage brokerage, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered marks BLACKPLUM for financial advice and consultancy services, and PLUMDOG for mortgage brokerage. [read post]
