Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 9,064
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2010, 12:26 pm
As the details of the lawsuit emerge, legal experts are split in their opinions as to whether the suit will ever reach Supreme Court, and whether it will succeed or not. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:45 am
The Supreme Court has not rendered an opinion on felon disenfranchisement for a very long time, but Justice O'Connor has.Yesterday, a panel of the Ninth Circuit issued this opinion in the Arizona case of Harvey v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:45 am
The Supreme Court has not rendered an opinion on felon disenfranchisement for a very long time, but Justice O'Connor has.Yesterday, a panel of the Ninth Circuit issued this opinion in the Arizona case of Harvey v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:56 am
Supreme Court 1989). [read post]
27 May 2010, 8:11 pm
Bookere, No. 07-1970 (6th Cir 5/25/2010) “District court’s grant of defendant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a conviction for criminal sexual misconduct is affirmed as the Michigan Court of Appeals’ exclusion of certain evidence of victim’s sexual conduct deprived defendant of his constitutional right to a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense as articulated by the Supreme Court in Crane. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:56 am
On Thursday, the challengers drew support in the Supreme Court from a political action committee for the Arizona Free Enterprise Club, and from the Arizona Taxpayers Action Committee, along with several other privately financed candidates, who also have intervened in the case. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am
Jonathan Chait bemoans the current state of the Supreme Court nomination and confirmation process at the New Republic, describing Kagan as embodying the “state-of-the-art modern Supreme Court nominee” – a young candidate with no record of legal opinions but with strong connections to the establishment of the party in power. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:21 pm
FEC--the Supreme Court's January 21 ruling striking down limits on independent campaign expenditures--the Ninth Circuit last week in McComish v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 7:03 pm
The application also argued that the Arizona scheme is invalid under the Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling in Davis v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 6:54 am
Supreme Court to weigh Arizona's tax credit law": The Arizona Republic contains this article today. [read post]
25 May 2010, 6:30 am
Doubtless inspired by a small group of self-described victims of the system who protested outside Arizona’s Supreme Court, Appeals Court Judge Ann Timmer has announced her recommendation to add 2 members from the public ranks from those with firsthand experience with the way the system deals with the administration of a ward’s care and finances. [read post]
25 May 2010, 5:07 am
Unlike the first (in which cert was denied), the Supreme Court agreed to put the second set on its docket. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm
As Stohr notes in another story at Bloomberg, the Court also agreed, in Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:56 pm
On February 23 and 24, 2010, the Supreme Court announced its decisions in Florida v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:39 am
(Eugene Volokh) The Supreme Court just agreed to hear Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:25 am
Supreme today agreed to review two consolidated cases involving an Establishment Clause challenge to Arizona's school tuition tax credit program. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:06 am
Supreme Court: The Court today issued opinions in six argued cases. 1. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am
The Supreme Court has twice issued rulings in the dispute, but so far has not yet made a final decision on its constitutionality. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:30 am
Forty-four percent (44%) of voters in the state oppose the confirmation of President Obama's latest Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:14 am
The Arizona Supreme Court is also reportedly investigating the probate court’s roll in guardianship, to prevent elder abuse or negligence. [read post]
