Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 7701 - 7720 of 10,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2010, 1:27 am by INFORRM
” which points out that the Act is unnecessary as these judgments are never enforced in the United States in any event. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The FMS says: One of your employees has been identified as owing a delinquent nontax debt to the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:01 am by Joe Consumer
  In Wyeth v Levine, the Court pointed out that “Congress did not intend FDA oversight to be the exclusive means of ensuring drug safety and effectiveness’ and that state law serves as a ‘complementary form of drug regulation. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:53 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division recently issued an opnion on a case where the 60 day notice provision of Texas Insurance Code, Section 541.154. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 9:18 am by Scott Tippett
Following the decedent’s death on January 23, 2005 the decedent’s estate filed a Form 706 (United States Estate and Generation Skipping Transfer Tax Return). [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 6:33 am
In the Constitution of the United States, they (corporations) are delegated no authority to make our laws and define our culture. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 8:23 pm
On the other side of the fence, In Kitzmiller v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 10:46 am by Floyd Abrams
To that, Black responded: “No purpose,” he wrote, “in ratifying the Bill of Rights was clearer than that of securing for the people of the United States much greater freedom of religion, expression, assembly, and petition than the people of Great Britain had ever enjoyed. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm by Samuel Bray
An amicus brief for several state and local government associations, including National League of Cities and the United States Conference of Mayors, argues, among other things, that nationwide injunctions have become accepted in current doctrine. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:49 am by INFORRM
  The common law has developed a law of privacy without a Human Rights Act in New Zealand, some Australian states and parts of Canada. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:30 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
The common law has developed a law of privacy without a Human Rights Act in New Zealand, some Australian states and parts of Canada. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The common law has developed a law of privacy without a Human Rights Act in New Zealand, some Australian states and parts of Canada. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 9:34 pm
R&TC Section 17014(b) provides a special rule for certain United States Government officials and their spouses. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:07 am by Marcia Coyle
The Brennan Center for Justice, a nonpartisan law and policy institute, reported in February that “thus far this year, 33 states have introduced, pre-filed, or carried over 165 bills to restrict voting access—four times the number of similar bills proposed at roughly the same time last year. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
John Marshall (the third Chief Justice): If the government of the United States “were to make a law not warranted by any of the powers enumerated, it would be considered by the judges as an infringement of the Constitution which they are to guard. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 5:32 pm
" [6] President Bush stated the bill "is large enough to have an impact, amounting to more than $152 billion this year, or about 1 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP). [read post]