Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 15,439
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am
Ten months on from the 13 May 2014 ruling of the Grand Chamber of the European Court in Case C131-12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD), Mario Costeja Gonzalez, Google has received 234, 384 requests for removal of links and evaluated 850, 385 URLs. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:12 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:18 am
Although the period of the father's incarceration has expired, the appeal from so much of the order as determined that he violated the order of protection is not academic in light of the enduring consequences which may potentially flow from an adjudication that a party has been found to have violated an order of the Family Court (see Matter of Bickwid v Deutsch, 87 [29 A.D.3d 1014] NY2d 862 [1995]; Matter of Cutrone v Cutrone, 225 AD2d 767, 768 [1996]). [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
It appears there is no good faith basis for suggesting, as a number of shoplifting demand letters do, that a retailer has a cause of action against a parent for theft and conversion because of a child’s shoplifting. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
Estate of Hanna, et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:32 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Montanile v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:00 pm
The Court closes out the last day of its March argument session with the second of a pair of bankruptcy cases, Harris v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:37 am
Prosecutor v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 6:01 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:21 am
Joel Alicea is a smart young conservative with a bright future in the conservative legal movement. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:07 am
As Lord Neuberger explained at para 14: “… the legal meaning of the expression “as of right” is, somewhat counter-intuitively, almost the converse of “of right” or “by right”. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:43 pm
Give it upGaye v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 2:02 pm
The court only needed to consider three cases to determine that preemption did not bar plaintiffs’ claim: Levine, Maya v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
And as the Supreme Court made clear 50 years ago in Brandenburg v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 11:30 am
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard argument in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 3:14 pm
" Conversely in the Estate of Heggstad (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th, the trust there did describe the property with some particularity. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
Michigan v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
In Doe v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:05 am
Faulkner v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:38 pm
Based on our conversations to date, I don’t think this is what you have in mind for your China WFOE. [read post]
