Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States" Results 7701 - 7720 of 14,933
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Earlier this year, Chief Justice Roberts wrote a majority opinion in Rucho v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
In addition, access to counsel was far more difficult from Mexico than it is in the United States, where accessing counsel is difficult enough. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Anna Christensen
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal made the government’s position clear:  the City violated Title VII each time it made a hiring decision based on an improper classification. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The Colorado government’s position, and that of the United States, as amicus curiae, is that the state evidence rule (which is similar to the federal one) ought to govern. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Anastasia Bradatan
Therefore, Gul asserted that the United States had lost the authority to detain him at all. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 4:07 am by David Fraser
Allies in the United States, Britain, Australia and New Zealand are confronting the same issues, Paulson added. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Constitution treats Native tribes as what Chief Justice John Marshall described in the 1831 case of Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm by Ryan Anderson
Because of space constraints, I highlight these four harms with quotations solely from Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:06 am by Scott Bomboy
Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
  Trump adviser Peter Navarro and Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications Dan Scavino had also refused to respond to subpoenas, and in March, the House voted to refer them to the Justice Department for contempt prosecutions. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:28 am by Rachel Sachs
Nicolaus Mills, writing in The Philadelphia Inquirer, focuses more broadly on Chief Justice Roberts’ role in the case. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:59 pm
” Garre also had some trouble with Justice Breyer over whether the Iraqi military command actually was a U.S. operation rather than an international force, but the government lawyer stuck by his argument, contending that “an international body distinct from the United States is controlling the strings. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 1:43 pm by Matt Gluck
They discussed how the deal could impact regional dynamics and domestic politics within Israel, Iran and the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:16 pm by Benjamin Wittes, Zoe Bedell
And, as we noted in the previous post, the Chief Justice held out the possibility that “future applications of the material-support statute to speech [might not] survive First Amendment scrutiny. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 7:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The moral bankruptcy of the animal exploitation position was on display in the Prop 12 oral argument when Chief Justice Roberts suggested that there’s a moral basis for opposing animal welfare measures that impose financial costs. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
United States, the Court ruled that the use of informant testimony is constitutional so long as any statements allegedly made by the defendant are made voluntarily. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
The bad news for the friends of federalism is that the 4-4 decision was likely the result of Chief Justice Roberts' recusal: It is difficult to believe that Roberts who joined Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion in Gonzales v Oregon, would tolerate state tort claims rooted in the allegation that a manufacturer committed fraud against the FDA. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:30 am by Seán Binder
  The United States, Philippines, and Japan held their first trilateral coast guard maneuvers yesterday. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 5:54 am
Sullivan, the United States Attorney is not being faithful to a cardinal principle of our legal system, i.e., that all persons stand equal before the law and are to be treated equally in a Court of justice once judicial processes are invoked. [read post]