Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 12,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2009, 7:04 am
Kirleis, however, challenged the legitimacy of the By-Laws’ arbitration provision, arguing that she: a) had never been provided with a copy of the firm’s By-Laws; b) was never informed the By-Laws contained an arbitration provision; c) never signed any agreement or other document referring to or incorporating the arbitration provision; and d) never agreed to arbitrate her claims. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 1:46 am
(c) Further, surely now the landlord can drive the RTM company into insolvency. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 11:26 am
In the 11th Circuit’s Moody decision, issued on May 23, 2022, Judge Kevin C. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 3:12 pm
The complaint seeks damages on behalf the purported plaintiff class under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, as well as under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
At that point, your company had three alternatives: a) the company could have made a greater effort to obtain the signatures of those who balked, offering financial or other incentives to incentivize the employees to sign; b) the company could have made the difficult decision to part ways with the employees who refused to sign; or c) the company could have elected to stick with the original signed agreement. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 9:43 am
The judge relied heavily on the reasoning in Gillies v Goldman Sachs Canada Inc., 2000 BCSC 355 (CanLII) where the British Columbia Supreme Court provided a list of factors that help determine if an employee has a reasonable expectation of entitlement to a bonus: (a) whether a bonus was received in prior years; (b) whether bonuses were required in order to remain competitive with other employers; (c) whether bonuses were historically awarded and the employer had ever exercised… [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:41 am
., a so-called “Little Miller Act” claim) against the prime contractor and its bonding company. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 8:38 am
501(c)(3) grants: General rule: Grants sourced based on residence of grantor – IRC §863 Regulations §1.863-1(d): Targeted grants from c3s grantors to non-U.S. grantees are not U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:00 am
However, Section 230(c)(2)(B) still plays an essential role for anti-threat software makers, at least until jeopardized by the Enigma v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
This post summarizes published criminal decisions (and two other decisions of note) from the North Carolina Court of Appeals decided on October 15, 2019. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:42 am
(From 2024) c) (Dividend Record Date) As different companies may have different record dates, authorities will set up an integrated website providing information about listed companies’ dividend record dates. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 6:09 am
Motions for remand are governed by 28 USC, Section 1447(c). [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:03 am
Reg. 403/96, s. 57(1)(b)) Who pays for a Canadian driver’s benefits? [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 2:02 pm
These violations included no signature by the employer swearing that it had completed the verification, no entries under List A OR under List B and List C, and/or no expiration dates where applicable. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 2:17 pm
C. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 7:17 am
They include: (a) restricting disclosure of company non-public information through social media sites; (b) ensuring that blog articles and posts express only the author's view and not that of the company, its clients or business partners; (c) requiring that upon termination of employment, the employee change her status to reflect that she is no longer employed by or affiliated with the company; and (d) preventing an employee from making disparaging… [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
"Conversion" as defined in IC. 35-43-4-3 and/or c. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 11:47 am
Part B: Does the worker perform work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business? [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:04 pm
However, employers still need to be very careful in what they communicate to others within the company, and should usually keep the information limited to individuals who have a need to know. 5. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 9:03 pm
As voluntary inspection is funded by fees paid by the requesting company there is no financial burden to the USDA. [read post]
