Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 9,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2010, 6:29 pm
With respect to invalidity, the Order states that Nokia based its argument on ALJ Bullock’s Order No. 18 construing the terms of the asserted claims, wherein ALJ Bullock found claim 1 indefinite under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
Two other points of interest: 1. the court does not wade into the issue of whether there are any exceptions to sovereign immunity beyond those set out in the statute (para. 24), and 2. the court accepts the factual findings of the English decision as part of its analysis, prior to concluding that the decision is enforceable in Canada (para. 34). [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:30 am
”[1] This requirement, also known as the best mode requirement, is in essence a quid pro quo with the inventor. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:38 am
Smith [Continued from yesterday's Part 2 and the preceding Part 1.] [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 12:20 pm
A typical invalidated claim includes Claim 1 of Patent No. 5,747,282 which reads “1. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:11 am
This move contrasts with Arkansas's Issue 1, which expressly retains power for its game and fish commission, which is itself constitutionally based (see amend. 35). [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 pm
§ 103, but were invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:29 pm
The case of Lindon v France (2008] 46 EHRR 35 is a good example of the new approach of the court. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
According to Art. 1 of the Notice of 3 December 2003 documents other than priority documents could be filed electronically in grant proceedings. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:41 am
Davis in a letter dated January 29, 2010, which stated: 1. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:15 pm
Does anyone know whether now Gunner’s Mate Apprentice Medina will receive any practical benefit from the retroactive diminution in confinement and reduction? [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:09 pm
1. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:35 pm
That statute does not require written objections to a special assessment; an oral objection at a hearing is sufficient. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:47 am
Another question that is asked concerning child support is, “What happens if a parent does not pay his/her child support? [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 4:35 am
It then said at [53] that the guidance it had set out at [35] was applicable by analogy. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
The Judgment below contains the entire law relating to the nature, scope and ambit of the writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.35. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:30 am
35. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:51 pm
., favor larger copyright entities and not the little guys.1. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:15 am
Secord (1979), 16 B.C.L.R. 48, [1980] 1 W.W.R. 464, 106 D.L.R.(3d) 9 Ruttan, J. said the onus for showing that a party is competent to be examined rests on the party seeking his examination. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 pm
Under N.J.S. 2C:35-5, it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or purposely: (1) To manufacture, distribute or dispense, or to possess or have under his control with intent to manufacture, distribute or dispense, a controlled dangerous substance or controlled substance analog; or (2) To create, distribute, or possess or have under his control with intent to distribute, a counterfeit controlled dangerous substance. [read post]
