Search for: "Federal, Inc." Results 7701 - 7720 of 57,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2014, 2:37 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
La demanda fue presentada el pasado lunes en la corte federal de Minneapolis en representación de dos trabajadores de la compañía. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 6:06 am by NBlack
Most recently, this issue came up in a federal case out of the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 6:06 am by NBlack
Most recently, this issue came up in a federal case out of the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 2:04 pm by Taras Rudnitsky
Plaintiff: CACH LLC Original Creditor: HSBCConsumer Lending (USA) Inc., on behalf of Beneficial Company LLC and HFC Company LLC Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Bryan Manno, Esq. and Jeremy Soffler, Esq. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:52 pm
But then, on January 4, 2011, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 5:50 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Mishkin An Indiana federal court recently granted in part and denied in part the motion of ITT Educational Services, Inc. to dismiss the CFPB’s complaint. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 11:19 pm
A joint venture between Bechtel Infrastructure Corp. and PB Americas Inc. and certain design consultants have agreed to pay the United States and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts a total of $458 million to settle allegations that PB Americas violated federal and state criminal and civil laws by failing to provide adequate construction management and quality assurance services to the Central Artery Tunnel, known as one of the Big Dig, in Boston. [read post]
5 May 2010, 4:20 am by Howard Friedman
It is expected that the federal court will hand down a sentence on the 86 counts of financial fraud later this month. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 10:15 pm by Robert Kraft
The Louisville (KY) Courier-Journal reported that “the maker of a new test for colorectal cancer is suing Louisville-based Humana Inc., alleging its denial of payment for screenings performed on more than 4,600 patients violates state and federal law. [read post]