Search for: "In Re Brand"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 14,134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2013, 10:25 am
See In re Jacob Demmer KG at 1201. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 1:24 am
As Nyhan documents, she re-emerged in 2009 when "she invented the false claim that the health care legislation in Congress would result in seniors being directed to 'end their life sooner.'" [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:18 am
If you are qualified to vote in the presidential election, you are certainly qualified to vote in Kobach's re-election bid next year. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 6:34 am
Unless you’re Ferrari or Maserati, you really have to be there. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 5:40 am
To qualify as a protectable mark, a slogan like “Show Your Joe” or “Show You’re Jockey” would need to acquire a secondary meaning, or, enough recognition that when rattled-off, the brand linked to the slogan immediately comes to mind. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 6:54 pm
The master case is In re Topamax Litigation, 110602131, Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
Many other companies have sought to protect their colour branding, oftentimes successfully. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:44 pm
I find it staggering that we’re even here having this conversation. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
In some ways this case is reminiscent of another case where a company’s branding consultant pushed the envelope (Roger Cleveland Golf v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 11:25 am
Welcome to not only our new home for blogging, but our brand new website! [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:52 am
It has a new branding now, the “Copyright Hub. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:19 am
In re MWR Holdings, LLC, Serial No. 85490234 (October 29, 2013) [not precedential]. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 1:25 pm
Finally and curiously, another brand new provision could bind all parties to go online with their IP rules, codes, statutes and regulations -- and, perhaps, IP databases too. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 8:36 am
Given that plaintiff denied writing the post and the Center could not produce a copy of it, you’re left with a disputed fact as to authorship. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 10:51 am
The court said that in cases where ads could confuse consumers, brand owners should invoke their rights against the advertisers concerned, not against Google — unless Google failed to act on a complaint or actively manipulated keywords. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:32 am
Invega is also an atypical antipsychotic drug that’s a brand name for paliperidone. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:13 am
Do large law firm CIOs need to re-think the core stack supporting law firms? [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Ct. 2567 (2011), so we’re not going over that again. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 3:24 am
But they’re only the beginning – because, as a former United States Attorney, I know from experience that it takes more than financial support to combat crime. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
., and several other provinces actually, we’re in good company. [read post]
