Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 12,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2007, 3:09 am
Going the Commetce Clause route, on the other hand, promised what was in fact achieved, an almost perfunctory, absolutely ineloquent, but unanimous set of opinions by the Court upholding the CRA. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:19 am
All the Wellness opinions provide fodder for limiting the scope of Stern to, well pretty much to, Section 157. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:58 pm
Section 2 of the VRA, which is untouched by today’s opinion, forbids any “standard, practice, or procedure . . . imposed or applied . . . to deny or abridge the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color”. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
” Justice Scalia has since suggested that he has “become increasingly doubtful of [Auer’s] validity” in a concurring opinion in Talk America. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 5:54 pm
The class was challenging, and forced me to re-examine everything I thought I believed, and everything that generations of justices had said in their opinions. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:30 pm
Earlier this month, the judge issued a preliminary order requiring her to issue those couples a license when they re-apply. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:37 pm
Dissenting Justice Kathryn Werdegar raised similar concerns in her opinion. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:49 am
Justice Ginsburg was a champion of a woman’s right to choose. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 3:00 am
Fortune reports that Justice Kagan, the Supreme Court’s young techno-savvy Justice, is hip to the jive of link shortening and used a Google-shortened link in her dissent in Utah v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 11:09 am
You're in good company: so does Judge Berzon. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
Late last month the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lord Justice Mummery, Lady Justice Black and Sir John Chadwick) agreed that the appeal should be dismissed. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:34 am
’s quotes from the AdVic representative constituted approval for those opinions. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:58 pm
We’re no exception. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:48 am
They’re allowed. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
If you arrive at page 63 of this opinion, what you'll learn is that: "We've arrived at page 63 of this opinion, but we're still not ready for the merits. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 6:04 pm
In re Caremark Int’l Inc. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm
We're one step ahead of you here at the Glom, Justice Kennedy, at least where business, law, economics, and society are concerned. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
Husband presented "expert testimony" from a Certified Family Law Specialist that in her opinion, all the bonuses were community property. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:52 am
Hans, a professor of law at Cornell Law School published an article on April 20, 2018 titled Trial by Jury: An American Expert Tells Us What We’re Losing. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
” Justice Crane identified the competing, foundational cases as the Court of Appeals’ 1949 opinion in Sterling Industries Inc. v Ball Bearing Pen Corp. and its 1958 opinion in Paloma Frocks, Inc. v Shamokin Sportwear Corp. [read post]
