Search for: "Laws v. Laws"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 269,310
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Written by Mark V. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
[1] Moody, et al., v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
Circuit's conclusion inUnited States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:35 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 8:44 am
Case Citation: Roland v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 8:21 am
Bradley Basu v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 am
In US v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am
"] Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:24 am
Gore Treatment” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:07 am
The post “The Ghose of Bush v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:53 am
Marimow, The Washington Post) US supreme court to hear arguments on keeping Trump off 2024 ballot (Sam Levine, The Guardian) The Ghost of Bush v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
Reading all the opinions here, it looks like the state of the law in the Second Circuit on Title IX discrimination is in flux. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
"* In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation of… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Earlier this week in County of Jefferson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
"* In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation of… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
United States) or whether an issue lacks "judicially discoverable and manageable standards" to apply as law (such as political gerrymandering claims, as in Rucho v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Ziadeh v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
Here is the abstract: In 2018, in Sexton v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Certainly the momentousness of, say, Bush v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
A.M.P. v Benjamin, 201 AD3d 50, 57 [3d Dept 2021]). [read post]