Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 7701 - 7720 of 120,416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  When Crockfords, citing Mr Ivey’s use of ‘edge sorting’, refused to pay Mr Ivey his winnings – which amounted to some £7.7m – Mr Ivey initiated proceedings for the recovery of the winnings in reliance on the gaming contract. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
In finding for the Claimant at interim stage Warby J required the Claimant to provide an undertaking that she would continue to use her best endeavours to identify and serve the Defendant (Kerner v WX [2015] EWHC 128). [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 4:34 am by Broc Romanek
A Biggie: US Supreme Court Opens Corporate Coffers to Political Campaigns Yesterday, in a 5-4 decision, the US Supreme Court delivered a surprising - and groundbreaking - opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm
One such case is Generics [UK] Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Yeda Research And Development Co Ltd and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 925, decided yesterday by a three-man Court of Appeal for England and Wales which consisted of two specialist IP judges -- Lords Justices Kitchin and Floyd -- together with Lord Justice Moses. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 4:06 pm
  Please contact us directly to discuss any questions you may have relating to the impact of this decision as it relates to your business. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:12 am
Infringing software hosted from a foreign web site may infringe a US patentIce Miller LLP"In a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 1:55 pm by Kyle Green
To set aside an offense means to cancel or revoke a judgment or order, so the original is modified, but it is not destroyed; the original may still be available for use. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 1:55 pm by Kyle Green
To set aside an offense means to cancel or revoke a judgment or order, so the original is modified, but it is not destroyed; the original may still be available for use. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:29 am
On January 16, 2008, the Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in the Quanta v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 10:59 am
Mattel (certiorari granted May 29, 2007) brings this issue to the US Supreme Court. [read post]