Search for: "Petition of United States"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 23,983
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2017, 2:15 am
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:45 pm
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:06 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 10:43 am
United States; see my preview), the question presented in the second case (United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 6:07 pm
Wisconsin, 2019), the district court denied the petition of James M. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 12:01 am
According to the 2010 United States Census, 4,989 people identified as Acoma.[5] The Acoma have continuously occupied the area for more than 800 years. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 10:27 pm
Because of the safety protocols imposed in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, many federal bankruptcy courts throughout the United States have adopted modified operations to ensure that physical distancing is observed at all times and to prevent beginning a contagion in a United States bankruptcy court. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 2:52 pm
Department of Agriculture (2013) 133 S.Ct. 2053, holding that California raisin handlers could maintain a takings claim as an affirmative defense to an enforcement action filed by the United States, and that the Hornes were not required to first file their claim in the Federal Court of Claims. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
"The employee organization [Association] representing the School District's [District] teachers filed grievances on behalf of two of its members in the collective bargaining unit who were passed over for transfers to a particular school in the District in favor of unit members with less seniority. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
"The employee organization [Association] representing the School District's [District] teachers filed grievances on behalf of two of its members in the collective bargaining unit who were passed over for transfers to a particular school in the District in favor of unit members with less seniority. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:39 pm
In the United States the law requires that the prosecutor prove the guilt of each defendant at trial by a beyond a reasonable doubt standard. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:58 am
United States legal settlement notices section on the USCIS web site at www.uscis.gov. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
Munoz et al (Case Number 23-334), the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) reaffirmed the doctrine of consular nonreviewability ruling against a U.S. citizen’s spouse who argued that the federal government violated her due process rights by denying her Salvadoran spouse an immigrant visa based on an approved family-based petition. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
Munoz et al (Case Number 23-334), the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) reaffirmed the doctrine of consular nonreviewability ruling against a U.S. citizen’s spouse who argued that the federal government violated her due process rights by denying her Salvadoran spouse an immigrant visa based on an approved family-based petition. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 10:12 am
Pfizer is continuing its fight with generic drug manufacturer United Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:12 am
Her parents came to the United States to invest in a hotel and restaurant in a small town in Missouri. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:43 pm
Clinton, 48 M.J. 84 (C.A.A.F. 1998), and United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:43 pm
Therein, the court addresses the United States Trustee's motion to dismiss the joint filing of Balas and Morales because Balas and Morales are messieurs Balas and Morales. [read post]
