Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 7701 - 7720 of 9,855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2021, 7:04 am by Jan von Hein
Secondly, by examining more briefly the significance for the EU and its Member States of the change in the UK’s status from Member State to third country. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
  He ordered Verizon to turn over “telephony metadata”—essentially call logs—of all calls in which at least one party was in the United States; and he forbade Verizon from informing its customers that their phone activity (though not the content of their conversations) would be shared with the government in this way. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 11:09 am
Appellants-defendants Plaza Group Properties, LLC, Robert W. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Times had a piece “American Could Face Prison in Thailand After Posting Negative Reviews of a Resort”. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:42 am
Despite this behavior, Jefferson is a exalted figure in United States history. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 9:53 pm by John Knox
As in Empagran, the Court may say that even if the claim has a connection with the United States, the connection must be strong enough to make the exercise of jurisdiction not “unreasonable. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am by Andrew Hamm
” At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein argues that United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 3:48 am
Care to prevent HIV infection in prison: a moral right recognized by Canada, while the United States lags behind. 37 U. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:30 pm by Anna Christensen
  And although the State contended that a ruling covering both misadvice and omission would lead to a “flood” of challenges of existing guilty pleas made by noncitizen defendants, the Court countered that a similar concern was raised in Hill v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 8:57 am
Circuit, city officials said their appeal to the Supreme Court would present some variation of these questions: "(1) whether the panel majority's decision conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Quinta Jurecic, Alan Z. Rozenshtein
As if to calm the itchy fingers of a million Twitter pundits, the brief emphasizes that “[t]he United States does not express any view regarding the potential criminal liability of any person for the events of January 6, 2021, or acts connected with those events. [read post]