Search for: "State v House" Results 7701 - 7720 of 28,334
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2019, 4:08 am by Lyle Denniston
House of Representatives entirely away from the state legislatures. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:22 am by familoo
And where it is the state gathering and using this material there is a pretty good chance that it isn't lawful at all (parents need not panic this applies to situations where social workers are looking at and gathering data about private individuals). [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Last month, the SCOTUS ruled in Timbs v Indiana that a state's fine or forfeiture scheme may be excessive and thus unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 8:26 am by Bill Marler
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:48 pm by Emma Zack
Here are some highlights from this week’s innocence-related media: A Racial Pattern So Obvious, Even the Supreme Court Might See ItFlowers v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:29 pm by Scott R. Anderson
The Supreme Court affirmed as much in its 2015 decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 11:21 am by Oyez Project
The court heard argument this week in: Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:22 am by Lyle Denniston
The issue could return to the Supreme Court; the Court’s prior ruling in the Virginia case, Williams v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:05 am by Tessa Shepperson
In a subsequent case, (R (Goloshvili) v Secretary of State [2019]), a landlord was issued with a Notice of Letting to  Disqualified Person and was warned that if they did not evict the tenant they could “face an unlimited fine or be sent to prison for up to five years. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:04 pm by Giles Peaker
The post Game of forfeits appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 12:59 pm by Jessica Smith
And an arrest and/or criminal conviction record carries a host of collateral consequences that can prevent the defendant from getting a job, obtaining housing, and the like. [read post]
Lady Black’s judgment Lady Black extensively reviewed the authorities, beginning with the landmark judgments of the House of Lords in   In re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation) [1990] 2 AC and Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 7:43 am by Brandon Harter
That all changed in the January 2019 decision by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in Pittsburgh Logistics Systems v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:54 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Cesar Blanco also filed a related piece of legislation, HB 353, which essentially codifies the US Supreme Court case US v. [read post]