Search for: "State v. Force" Results 7701 - 7720 of 32,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2019, 12:33 pm by Florian Mueller
The latter is an issue that two automotive industry bodies have raised in a filing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.For a list of previous posts on amicus curiae briefs in FTC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ron Meuser
A first responder’s PTSD still must meet the criteria set forth in the DSM-V and be diagnosed by a doctor of psychology or a medical doctor working in a related field. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am by Marty Lederman
Cox immediately and to take all steps necessary to return to the Department of Justice the functions now being performed by the Watergate special prosecution force. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:19 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday the court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:28 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Although those summaries do not have the force of law, they are the “official” annotations legally authored by the state. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:19 am by Marco D'Ostuni
In both instances, weakened licensees might be forced to offer lower quality, higher prices and less innovative services. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian considers how surveillance companies are assisting in state surveillance mandates. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:09 am by Florian Mueller
For an example, the Computer & Communications Industry Association's brief, in addition to the CCIA having some members that are not involved with the three other industry bodies who made such filings, is a pretty good primer on the case (especially together with Professor Jorge Contreras's brief), while the Fair Standard Alliance brief presupposes a certain level of understanding--and ACT | The App Association made a particularly forceful submission that warns against the… [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 8:06 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Hills, 75 M.J. 350 (C.A.A.F. 2016) and United States v. [read post]