Search for: "State v. Mai" Results 7701 - 7720 of 133,208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2009, 5:06 am
In returning to state court, facing AEDPA's one year limitations bar, the petitioner risks that his now exhausted claims may not be timely. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:48 am by Steve Statsinger
Another crop of three:In United States v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:26 pm by Nassiri Law
The state statute codified into law the California Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by John C. Coffee, Jr.
Later, I will suggest that, next term, the Court may go even further and use the dormant Commerce Clause to limit the authority of the states where state legislation has some extraterritorial impact.[6] First, however, a very brief tour of constitutional history is needed. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:30 pm by Venkat
In other words, an employee's violation of an employer's network policy may state a claim under Section 502 because it's the same as unauthorized access. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 11:12 am by Brian A. Comer
As stated by the court:Under South Carolina law, punitive damages may be awarded to punish torfeasors who have acted in a "reckless, willful, or wanton" manner. [read post]