Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 29,606
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
In King v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 2:49 am
Vice Chancellor Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery recently had such a case before him in Longoria v Somers, C.A. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 7:55 pm
Save during the first trimester, the state of pregnancy, and the birth of child is rarely a purely private matter. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
For one of the prior cases on this, Morris v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 5:59 am
Friends of McMillan Park v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 3:15 am
Ltd. v Hai Lun Tang, 2019 TMOB 54 https://t.co/V2PWbByXaB 2019-07-14 YouTube 'Blocks' Popular MP3 Stream-Ripping Sites https://t.co/myg5hyvgq4 2019-07-14 A Win for Browsewrap? [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:37 pm
Sacramentans for Fair Planning v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:22 pm
Supreme Court decision in Plyler v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 11:57 am
See Yerian v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 11:57 am
See Yerian v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:24 pm
But, at least for now, the related case law in the United States is fundamentally better than in Germany, though this may be attributable in no small part to the historic happenstance of what cases were put before the courts in what sequence--and what questions for review the parties raised.Just so there is no misunderstanding: Dr. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:51 pm
Provide reasons for the decision to terminate to the executive so the executive cannot rely on the absence of a stated reason to mount their case that the termination must have been because they had exercised a workplace right. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:55 pm
Havis persists: Part III — United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:55 pm
Havis persists: Part III — United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:42 am
It would also vitiate the silly outcome U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 7:23 am
Stunkel v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 7:23 am
Stunkel v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:08 am
The complaint fails to set forth evidentiary facts demonstrating that Leavitt was a participant with Carrington in a common scheme or plan to defraud the plaintiffs, or otherwise aided and abetted Carrington in the commission of fraud (see Fredriksen v Fredriksen, 30 AD3d at 372; Goldfarb v Schwartz, 26 AD3d at 463-464). [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
The City of White Plains [the City] adopted an ordinance in 2010 that terminated the City's paying 100 percent of the premiums for health insurance on behalf of its retired police officers, requiring the retired officer to pay the difference, if any, between 85 percent of the cost of the premium for participation in the New York State Empire Health Insurance Program and the full premium for the health insurance plan in which the retired officer was enrolled.Retired police… [read post]
