Search for: "State v. Word" Results 7701 - 7720 of 40,667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In other words, the dispositive inquiry is whether the employee has been continuously assigned to light-duty work — not, as petitioners argue, whether such employee has in fact continuously performed the light duties to which he or she was assigned (see Matter of Keil v New York State Comptroller, 66 AD3d at 1318; Matter of Vicks v Hevesi, 45 AD3d at 1038).Contrary to petitioners' assertion, the record reflects that Breslin was continuously assigned to… [read post]
3 May 2023, 10:45 am by Christopher G. Hill
  The words in contracts matter and, in Virginia (as well as other states), most provisions, if not all will be enforced to the letter. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:20 pm
On the one hand, the Court has broadly construed the First Amendment's protections to include not simply speech or written words, but also graphic depictions such as photographs and films (say, the depiction of the teenage lovers in Romeo and Juliet). [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 12:38 pm
I, p. 340.)We write today to 'own' that the procedure we approved in Biljac Associates v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
He referred to the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] E.M.L.R. 31. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:43 pm
Although the Court did not explicitly invoke that word in discussing why the Complaint had to be dismissed in Iqbal v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 4:53 am
How often do you hear the N-word, the B-word, anti-Semitic remarks or rants against homosexuality? [read post]