Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 14,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2022, 9:05 am
" The agreement states that if a non-white teacher is subject to excess, MPS must excess a white teacher with the "next least" seniority. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:57 am
The idea that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation should be subject to strong judicial scrutiny has no roots in the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment and only a modest basis in recent precedent (Romer v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 9:36 pm
But there is at least a strong likelihood that they won't. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:00 pm
In Buch v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:41 am
In Leong v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
See Colacicco v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:33 pm
See Hopper v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:06 pm
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:22 am
Some securities lawyers said the SEC’s 22-page complaint offered strong evidence that Goldman should have disclosed information about Paulson. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:24 pm
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Credit Suisse Securities v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 1:47 pm
There were, however, two strong dissenting opinions and it appears that the matter may go to the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
” In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Nicholas Stephanopolous assesses the relevance of last week’s strong Democratic election showing in Virginia to the issues in the Supreme Court’s pending partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
Lynch, et. al. strongly re-states the Virginia courts’ strong reluctance to allow a breach of contract turn into a claim for fraud. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:04 am
In the [some] big states... [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 7:14 am
Lynch, et. al. strongly re-states the Virginia courts’ strong reluctance to allow a breach of contract turn into a claim for fraud. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:06 am
Jeffrey James D.C. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:49 pm
The Commission continues to believe that a strong and effective guideline system best serves the purposes of sentencing established by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:48 pm
The Commission continues to believe that a strong and effective guideline system best serves the purposes of sentencing established by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 5:56 am
This despite commentary in the Court Rules book following 5:5-4 stating that a "strong presumption" favoring oral argument on such motions exists. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:59 pm
Remember Berghuis v. [read post]
