Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 7701 - 7720 of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2014, 8:13 am by Jennifer Farer
On March 4, 2014, in a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court decided its first case under Sarbanes-Oxley’s whistleblower protection provision, Section 806. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
Your commission as Attorney General of the United States will be noted in the records of the court. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:21 am by ksmcarlson
This is a considerable shift from present practices of the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:17 am by Liya Green
  The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) would then instruct the employer to file a petition on behalf of the prospective beneficiary named in the registration. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am by Amy Howe
  Other coverage comes from Katie Barlow and Nina Totenberg at NPR, while in his “Drama at the Court” series for ISCOTUSnow, Christopher Schmidt looks back at United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 8:33 am by Kara M. Maciel
By: Michael Thompson The United States Supreme Court has ruled that pharmaceutical sales representatives (PSRs) are “outside salesmen” who are not entitled to overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Collins v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:30 am by WSLL
Nachbar, Casper, WYRepresenting Appellee (Petitioner): Harry G. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:10 pm by sgottlieb
State of North Carolina, No. 13-604, Supreme Court of the United States, 2013 U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm by sgottlieb
State of North Carolina, No. 13-604, Supreme Court of the United States, 2013 U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 2:14 pm by Mark Zamora
Here is background and historical information from the FDA about Darvocet and Darvon:  Following receipt of a Citizen Petition requesting the withdrawal of propoxyphene-containing products from the United States market, FDA convened an Advisory Committee meeting on January 30, 2009. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 8:39 am by Andrew Frisch
For this reason, and because it is from the United States’ highest court, wage and hour practitioners would be wise to read the entire decision. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:49 am by Simon Lester
Haver (the petitioner) is a U.S. citizen who practices U.S. and French law as a foreign legal consultant in Germany. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:58 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  Dodd-Frank Section 1054(e) provides: The Bureau may represent itself in its own name before the Supreme Court of the United States, provided that the Bureau makes a written request to the Attorney General within the 10-day period which begins on the date of entry of the judgment which would permit any party to file a petition for writ of certiorari, and the Attorney General concurs with such request or fails to take action within 60 days of the request of the Bureau. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:39 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
United States, No. 11-597 (cert. granted Apr. 2, 2012), the case in which the Federal Circuit held that flooding caused by the Corps of Engineers was only temporary, and did not result in a compensable taking merely because it eventually stopped, and "at most created tort liablity. [read post]
United States, 432 F.2d 1052 (3d Cir. 1970), and pointing out that, in determining whether all substantial rights to a patent were transferred, the Court must consider not only the terms of the contracts but also the intent of the parties. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]