Search for: "United States v. Was" Results 7701 - 7720 of 102,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2014, 5:41 am by Mary Pat Dwyer
Bridges 13-657 Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution allows States to tax goods distributed by out-of-state wholesalers more heavily than goods distributed by in-state wholesalers. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 5:43 am
Janet Bond Arterton United States District Judge United States District Court District of Connecticut Richard C. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
The Court concluded that the Constitution’s Suspension Clause did not apply to the petitioner because the right he was seeking—to remain in the United States under the nation’s immigration laws—fell outside the historical core of the Suspension Clause, which was limited to challenging detention as such. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 2:08 pm
United States (07-10689) is available here. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 12:03 pm by Gerard Magliocca
From the oral argument today, the most likely result is that the Court will either decide the case without reaching the merits or stall for as long as possible and hope that there is more information from the Department of Commerce about the count of people who are in the United States illegally. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 11:33 am by Dennis Crouch
The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
7/27/1929: The Geneva Conventions are signed by United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
7/27/1929: The Geneva Conventions are signed by United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 1:57 pm
On August 10, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the decision of the lower courts in the matter of Alexsandr Nikolaevich Kashin and the United States of America v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 8:27 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Appellants later filed this putative class action in the District of North Dakota, claiming that the United States had breached its fiduciary duty by approving the leases for the oil and gas mining rights, and that the defendant bidders aided, abetted, and induced the United States to breach that duty. [read post]