Search for: "mark"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 136,118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2024, 3:30 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of the mark CASA BONITA for "Tortillas; Corn-based snack foods; Tortilla chips; Tortilla shells" in view of the identical mark registered for "restaurant services. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:31 am
Slattery, Cancellation No. 92052155 [Petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark BILL PINKNEY'S ORIGINAL DRIFTERS for "entertainment Services in the nature of live performances by a musical group," on the ground that Opposer is the owner of superior rights in the mark THE DRIFTERS, and the registered mark is likely to cause confusion with Opposer's mark].May 29, 2014 - 2 PM: Wonton Food v. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:16 am
It has been said that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 4:18 am
PatentsRose Hughes discussed the importance of meticulous documentation in securing and defending intellectual property rights, highlighting how detailed records can be crucial in legal disputes.Rose Hughes examined the Unified Patent Court's (UPC) evolving approach to added matter and priority issues in patent litigation.Jocelyn Bosse informed on the progression of EU legislation regarding gene patents, detailing the potential impact on biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries.Trade… [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 1:21 am
The mark was published in the daily newspaper La Nation in 9 June 2011 subject to cancellation within five years from the publication date, there being no opposition stage.A Turkish company, Yildiz Holding Anonim Sirketi ('Yildiz') filed a cancellation action before the Commercial Court, citing the following:* prior registrations of ULKER BISKREM as word mark and in various designs by Yildiz in Djibouti, as well as the Czech Republic, Germany, Pakistan, Slovak… [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:11 am
Rozier applied to register the mark CLETAXI for taxi transport services, but the USPTO refused registration, finding the mark merely descriptive of the services under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 3:37 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of the mark LIVEWIRE for "Alcoholic beverages, not including beer" in view of the registered mark MOUNTAIN DEW LIVEWIRE for "soft drinks, and syrups and concentrates for making the same. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 2:48 am
Applicant argued that the mark as a whole "has no meaning," and that "the Board has approved marks that convey more about the respective goods or services than does Applicant's mark. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:37 am
[Opposition by Rockport to registration of the mark shown below left for various clothing items, including footwear, in view of the registered mark shown below center, and the common law mark shown below right, for footwear, and "counter-opposition" by Savoy to registration of the third mark.] [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
Instead, petitioner had to establish that Scripps stopped using the mark with an intent not to resume use.The evidence did establish that Scripps stopped using the mark for two years. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 10:00 pm
Ask yourself whether each mark's usage (say, in advertising or packaging) reflects the mark as registered. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 3:32 am
Adlin) [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown below left, for "luggage; schoolbags; backpacks;" "textile flags and pennants;" and various clothing items, including jackets, shirts, and headwear, in view of the registered marks FORTY SEVEN, 47, '47, and the mark shown below right for, inter alia, backpacks, duffel bags, cloth pennants; felt pennants, and various clothing items, including jackets, shirts, and headwear.] [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 7:14 am
Same as Peru, registration of collective trade marks in Argentina is free of charge. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 2:02 pm
The court was asked to decide whether the American artist Katy Perry was liable for trade mark infringement and whether the trade mark “KATIE PERRY” registration should be cancelled. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 2:43 am
Mikhail Levitin T/A Mikhail Levitin Institute, Opposition No. 91202898 [Opposition to registration of the mark shown below for "anti-aging cream" on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with, and likelihood of dilution of, the registered mark L'OREAL and related marks, for beauty care products, including face cream and face lotion].Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog note: Any predictions? [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:00 am
[Refusal to register the mark shown below left, for "yoga instruction" [YOGA and "Om symbol" disclaimed], in view of the registered mark shown below right for, inter alia, "yoga instruction" [YOGA FLORIDA disclaimed]]. [read post]
13 May 2020, 5:42 am
" They assume that if the accused mark is likely to create an association with the famous mark, then there must be a likelihood of impairment to the distinctiveness of the famous mark. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 2:20 am
It has been said that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 11:28 am
By Mark S. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:49 am
Or doesn't "lose its mark"? [read post]
