Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 7721 - 7740 of 191,937
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2023, 11:22 pm by Michelle David
The Constitutional Court has provided much needed certainty to the retirement fund industry following the surprising April 2022 judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Municipal Employees Pension Fund & Another v Pandelani Midas Mudau and Another. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
This is Part V in EFF’s ongoing series about the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:13 am by tania.jara@lawrank.com
Schedule V substances Lastly, there are Schedule V drugs, which hold the least risk in terms of addiction/abuse while being widely used for common ailments. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:15 am by admin
This West Chester lawmaker invited her testimony, chair says,” Ohio Capital Journal (July 14, 2021). [2] The Disinformation Dozen (2021), [3] Shaw v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 8:22 am
The Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 8:21 am by Christine Corcos
The Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am by Jeffrey Sonnenfeld
Some admirers of New Zealand’s popular former prime minister Jacinda Ardern’s track record on social harmony, gun safety, economic growth, and public health suggest she would have been a great US president, but, alas, she is not a natural born US citizen. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has reinstated a disability discrimination claim, holding that a jury may find that the Suffolk County District Attorney's Office failed to reasonably accommodate the plaintiff's disability, a back injury.The case is Tafolla v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am by Ioannis Kouvakas
” Indeed, ensuring that the IPA applies abroad has been a major policy goal for the United Kingdom, following the 2015 Report of the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, which noted that companies “will reject requests which they feel are illegal in their host jurisdiction, or which they believe it would be unethical to meet, for example where the interests of a third country might be adversely impacted. [read post]