Search for: "Brown v. State"
Results 7721 - 7740
of 8,750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2010, 6:01 am
Part V of that Act provides a legislative framework for legal services including advocacy to be offered by businesses consisting of lawyers and non-lawyers. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 7:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:04 pm
In today’s case (Basi v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm
Brown of Darrah, Darrah & Brown, P.C., Powell, Wyoming. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
": Edith Brown Weiss, Inspection Panel, World Bank & Georgetown U. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:21 am
The 1978 case of Lusby v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:57 am
John Bartlow Martin’s The Deep South Says Never documented the rise of the White Citizens’ Council movement in opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:00 am
As a matter of doctrine, the Supreme Court settled this question, decisively rejecting the unitary executive theory in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 11:43 am
” California Governor Jerry Brown (D-Calif.) touted his state as a counterexample to the argument that more regulation is bad for the economy. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm
v=4TPuttz2wes Is lifetime sinecure a bad thing? [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 12:54 am
.
TODAY'S STORIES - December 20, 2006
Race-Based Programs May Face Final Curtain in Supreme Court
Legal Times
In 1954, William Coleman Jr. sat next to Thurgood Marshall as he argued Brown v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 10:33 am
Her commitment to equal education predated Brown v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
In Haas v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:05 pm
The rules make certain statements explicitly not hearsay by stating so clearly. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 12:42 pm
’” United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
