Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 7721 - 7740
of 31,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2019, 2:18 pm
Allen v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2011] EWHC 2616 (Admin) – Read judgment On 13 October 2011 Mr Justice Supperstone in the High Court held that changes to rules for calculating housing benefit were lawful and in particular did not breach equality legislation. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 2:11 pm
" (omitting citations) Alberto L. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:34 am
Ilott v Mitson and others [2011] EWCA Civ 346; [2011] WLR (D) 119 “Where an adult child sought to claim against the estate of a deceased parent under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, the first stage was a value judgment as to whether or not the deceased’s dispositions made reasonable financial provision for the claimant. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:36 am
Borger v Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse (Case C-516/09); [2011] WLR (D) 89 “The status of an ‘employed person’, within the meaning of article 1(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, as amended , applied to a person during a six-month period of extended unpaid leave following the birth of a child, provided that, during that period, that person was covered, even if only in respect of a single risk, on a compulsory or optional basis, by a general or special social… [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:45 am
” The dissent (in Smith v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:21 am
Although the real debate was likely to be about the innuendo meaning, R v Smith (Graham Westgarth) ([2002] EWCA Crim 683, [2003] 1 Cr App R 13) had dealt with what constituted the “making” of an indecent image, R v Smith considered. (3) Even if the pleaded defence was factually contentious and went beyond the statement, there was no need for injunctive relief against the press, whose editors were well aware of the duty not to prejudice criminal trials and of their… [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 3:47 pm
The officer entered the computer and viewed defendant's child porn. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 12:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 8:17 am
FERRER v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:08 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 11:30 am
All of this is apparent from Magical Marking Ltd and Andrew Phillis v Holly and others [2008] EWHC (Ch) 2428, a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Mr Justice Norris, delivered yesterday.Mrs Phillis incorporated Magical Marking (the first claimant) in order to set up a children's playground painting business which used spray paint in order to mark out templates for hopscotch and other playground games. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 2:00 am
Rogin (herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Post-Majority Child Support Ruling Reversed in Columbia: Johnston v. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 10:01 pm
" In L.L. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:40 pm
Let’s assume that the Supreme Court holds in Ohio v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:40 pm
Let’s assume that the Supreme Court holds in Ohio v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:54 am
Justice Burke concurred in part and dissented in part, with whom Chief Justice Kite joins.Case Name: BRANDON LEE JENSEN v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 4:40 pm
A spoiled child is never very attractive. [read post]
