Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 7721 - 7740 of 108,035
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2011, 2:03 pm by AALRR
  The Court of Appeal held UPS was not entitled to an award of prevailing party attorney's fees because Labor Code section 1194 permits only an award of attorney's fees to an employee who prevails on a claim for alleged unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation and does not permit an award of prevailing party attorney's fees to an employer that defeats such a claim. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:00 pm
The After Final Consideration Pilot allows an applicant to file an amendment that is narrowing to at least one independent claim and which does not broaden the other claims. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:55 am by zshapiro
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that United States law does not prohibit travel between two countries “with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct. [read post]
18 May 2009, 3:52 pm
The Court of Appeal opinion doesn't discuss that aspect of Campbell, but it does indicate that the defendant relied on Gober v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 7:00 am
 The dismissal was appealed to arbitration and was ultimately submitted to Arbitrator Richard John Miller for resolution. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 11:13 pm
First, the Court of Appeal held that the fact that a transfer of assets may have the effect of defeating a claim does not require the court to find that the person making the transfer intended to do so. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 6:46 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Because the insurance policy at issue permits Farmers to abate the case until Shafighi complies with the relevant policy provisions, but does not entitle it to summary judgment under these circumstances, this appeals Court reversed and remanded. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:55 pm by Brad Pauley
  By denying depublication, does the Court signal its agreement with the Court of Appeal’s decision, which will remain citable? [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:20 pm by David M. McLain
§ 38-33.3-217, the Court of Appeals held that the statute does not prohibit a declaration from requiring declarant consent for an amendment. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:20 pm by David M. McLain
§ 38-33.3-217, the Court of Appeals held that the statute does not prohibit a declaration from requiring declarant consent for an amendment. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 1:14 pm by Eric S. Solotoff
It is settled that consent of the parties does not create appellate jurisdiction. [read post]
16 May 2015, 6:15 am
The Court ruled the Petitioner failed to produce proof that it had followed the administrative appeal procedure and had made a timely written appeal of the denial of its FOIL request. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 4:11 am by Diane Tweedlie
The appealed decision in this case concerns a refusal by the Examining Division to reimburse the appeal fee after it had allowed interlocutory revision under Art. 109(1). [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:47 am by S
Mr Burr won in the LVT but lost in the Upper Tribunal.The Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal. [read post]