Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 7721 - 7740 of 16,617
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am by Marty Lederman
§ 1324a(h)(3) -- then the Secretary obviously does not cause the President to violate his "take Care" duty if he decides to exercise that statutorily conferred discretion.And if, on the other hand, Congress has clearly precluded the Secretary from exercising such discretion, then that's an ordinary statutory/APA violation, just as is alleged every day in countless other cases challenging agency actions. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 9:21 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Although this decision may in fact bolster judicial uniformity, it does not benefit the interests of plaintiffs who need adequate time to conduct pre-trial investigation of occasionally prejudicial videotape evidence. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 5:19 am by SHG
H/T Doug Berman   Copyright © 2015 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Wiswall
In a paper published last fall, Gail H. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:56 am by SHG
H/T Jill McMahon Copyright © 2015 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:30 pm by Andy Wang
The lawyer does not hold forth about his emotions. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:44 am by Andrew Frisch
With respect to any presentation of information, including any views or opinions, to any “putative class members” by the Defendants—whether acting through management, counsel, other employees, or any other agent of any kind—that relates to the allegations and claims in this action, whether for the purpose of gathering information in a one-on-one or group basis to defend this action or to address any employee complaints regarding past, current or future compensation practices,… [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 5:00 am by INFORRM
Contingencies should only be allowed where (1) they involve work that does not fall within the Precedent H categories, (2) can be clearly identified to the other side and the Court, and (3) are ‘more likely than not to be required’. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Question 3: H-1B CAP FY2016 If my wife has an H-1B Visa, can I apply for one under this year’s H-1B cap? [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Question 3: H-1B CAP FY2016 If my wife has an H-1B Visa, can I apply for one under this year’s H-1B cap? [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 7:24 am by Michael Geist
The law as it currently stands has weak annual reporting requirements from government agencies, does not provide much protection to Canadians from abusive treatment by foreign states, does not give the Privacy Commissioner order-making power, does not provide redress in cases involving harm, does not prevent over-collection of personal information, does not protect against surveillance where the data is not recorded, and does not feature security… [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 10:52 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Sari Horwitz reports in the WaPo:Attorney General Eric H. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 8:55 pm by Georgialee Lang
Other times, the law simply does not support the position advanced by counsel on behalf of a client. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:54 am by Steven Boutwell
More importantly, CMAR still does not provide all of the advantages of “design-build” because the public entity/owner is still required to enter into separate contracts with the design professional and contractor. [read post]