Search for: "High v State" Results 7721 - 7740 of 35,519
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Either very low-resourced creators or very high-resourced creators. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The right of the state to require vaccination was upheld in Jacobson v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:19 am
In easyGroup Ltd v Empresa Aérea de Servicios y Facilitatión Logística Integral S.A. - EasyFly S.A. and Anor [2020] EWHC 40 (Ch), the English High Court made life anything but easy for easyGroup. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Ireland Former Sinn Féin leader Gerry Adams wants the High Court to order the BBC to hand over more information he says he requires for a defamation case he is taking against the broadcaster. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 1:29 pm
Here's the abstract: Regional human rights courts (RHRC) are often tasked to promote not only states’ human rights obligations, but also rule of law standards including predictability, legality, and the independence, impartiality and high quality of the judiciary. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 3:31 am by Thalia Kruger
This was the question which the High Court of Justice (Family Division) had to answer in MM v NA: [2020] EWHC 93 (Fam). [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am by Robert Chesney
When the scope of the interstate commerce authority expanded during World War II, with the Supreme Court’s 1942 Wickard v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:32 am by Kalvis Golde
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Aaron Tang suggests that there is an issue lurking in Espinoza v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 6:08 am by Cory Doctorow
We believe that the EU's guidance to member states on Article 17 implementations should include a recommendation to create and maintain test suites if member states decide to establish copyright filters. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 8:28 am by Dennis Crouch
Principal Officers: Three En Banc Petitions in Arthrex v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:02 am
In a case of first impression in Singapore, the Singapore High Court has answered "yes", holding that the plaintiff would be precluded by public policy considerations from enforcing an agreement to transfer a registered domain name to the defendant. [read post]