Search for: "Line v. Line" Results 7721 - 7740 of 45,552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm by Blogger Bob
This can be achieved only if a passenger's identity is confirmed at the checkpoint. *** A recent case - New Mexico v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:03 am by Kenan Farrell
To be exempt, a business league’s activities must be devoted to improving business conditions of one or more lines of business as distinguished from performing particular services for individual persons. 501(c)(6) organizations are exempt from most federal income taxes. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 2:25 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Strasbourg authority recognised that there was no absolute requirement along the lines suggested by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
In a blow for rights-holders, the UK Supreme Court has today decided that ISPs should not bear the implementation costs for website blocking orders in Cartier International AG & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc & Anor [2018] UKSC 28. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:03 pm by Ronald Mann
The justices will close their first week back on the bench by finally hearing argument in Google v Oracle. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:26 am by CMS
“Pay now, argue later” is ultimately the decision of the Supreme Court in Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 10:33 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indemnification is the first and most important line of defense for the protection of directors and officers. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Foley (Ohio State University College of Law) has posted The Founders’ Bush v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
In a recent Supreme Court of Canada decision, Newfoundland and Labrador v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Zachary Fasman
On Monday, June 21, the Supreme Court in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 6:33 am by Jaclene D'Agostino
  Acknowledging that this was a case of first impression, the Second Department was guided largely by its decision in Campbell v Thomas, 73 AD3d 103 (2d Dept 2010). [read post]