Search for: "People v. Grant" Results 7721 - 7740 of 16,996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2016, 5:54 am by David Fraser
I blogged a couple of days ago about the important case of R v Rogers, 2016 ONSC 70 (Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Ontario court provides clear guidance on privacy and "tower dumps" in R v Rogers and Telus). [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 10:28 pm by Nassiri Law
A spokesperson for a national women’s policy institute said that this California law not only adds to the protections available to workers in the state, but it further establishes California’s history of being the first to offer many of the protections to employees that some people now take for granted. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 1:41 am by INFORRM
That people can go back on what they have said they will do in letters. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Lynch, 15-362, is for all you CAT People out there. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 1:24 pm by Lyle Denniston
” Actually, there does not seem to be any real risk of that, but the entire argument in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:59 am by Eric Goldman
The Court does not rely solely on the lawfulness of the Casino function for granting the Motion to Dismiss. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am by Aidan Wills, Matrix
By way of illustration, Ministry of Justice statistics for 2010/11 show that 40.6% of the people searched under section 60 were black, 26.3% were white, and 22% were Asian. [read post]