Search for: "People v. House" Results 7721 - 7740 of 12,873
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2014, 6:14 am
The judge began his analysis of that issue by explaining that the 4th Amendment protects `[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 1:43 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Some people think that the matter ends there: the IRS always wins, right? [read post]
Our victory benefited thousands of immigrant detainees across the Ninth Circuit, which houses 25 percent of people currently in immigration lock-up. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:30 am by azatty
How the state addresses the needs of the seriously mentally ill was the subject of Arnold v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The final Defamation Act was subjected not just to pre-legislative scrutiny but extensive debate in the House of Commons and the House of Lords. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Senate in 2018 (when Draper’s proposal would be sent to DC), or if the President in 2018 is a Democrat, then Draper’s measure might face partisan opposition in the Senate or in the White House (which has the power to veto any such measure), And all of that is to say nothing about how the creation of six Californias might affect the electoral college and partisan presidential politics, an extremely complicated question in its own right. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 12:00 pm by Stephen Gottlieb
Can you imagine how bad this country would be if the majority of the people actually elected the people’s House? [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm by Ron Coleman
 Contrast this with the old fashioned approach of learning things and meeting actual people. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 4:35 pm by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) Most students who take a property law class study the famous New York case of Stambovsky v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:00 pm by Lauren Bateman
 Here—and unlike plaintiffs in the Supreme Court’s Clapper v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm by Dave
The basic point is that the eligible amount for housing benefit is reduced by the excess over either £350 or £500pw (for singles and others respectively). [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm by Dave
The basic point is that the eligible amount for housing benefit is reduced by the excess over either £350 or £500pw (for singles and others respectively). [read post]