Search for: "Person v. Person" Results 7721 - 7740 of 123,271
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2023, 9:59 am by Josh Blackman
In short, if a person sees or hears some government-related religious content that offends him, he has Article III standing. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 8:06 am by Christopher G. Hill
Further, the mechanic’s lien agent notice must contain the following: (i) the name, mailing address, and telephone number of the person sending such notice, (ii) the person’s license or certificate number issued by the Board for Contractors pursuant to Chapter 11 (§ 54.1-1100 et seq.) of Title 54.1, if any, and the date such license or certificate was issued and the date such license or certificate expires, (iii) the building permit number on the building permit,… [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 7:02 am by Kristi L. Wolff and Cristina Ferretti
  It is just this scenario that is at issue in a pending false advertising lawsuit, Finster v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:07 am by Peter Mahler
In the one New York case I’ve blogged about in the last 15 years in which allegations of de facto dividends were prominent — Feldmeier v Feldmeier Equipment, Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Gold, The Demise of Roe v Wade Undermines Freedom of Religion, (ACS Blogs, Expert Forum, August 2022).Joshua Schroeder, Rethinking Rights in a Disappearing Penumbra: How to Expand Upon Reproductive Rights in Court After Dobbs, (54 N.M. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by John R. Byrne
ByrneIf you live in the Village of Pinecrest--or any other municipality in Miami-Dade--you may want to read Judge Altman's recent order in Megladon, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
YouTube has said its services are intended for persons older than 13 and should make an account with YouTube Kids. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 9:33 am by Giles Peaker
Rakusen v Jepsen & Ors (2023) UKSC 9 The issue for the Supreme Court was whether the wording of section 40 and 41 Housing and Planning Act 2016 meant that a rent repayment order could be made against only a tenant’s immediate landlord, or also against a superior landlord (where the occupying tenant’s landlord themselves had a tenancy of the property) where that landlord had also committed a relevant offence. [read post]
In this regard, the Interim Report recommends that the WFL prohibit workplace discrimination in respect of the following characteristics: (i) age, (ii) nationality, (iii) sex, marital status, pregnancy status, caregiving responsibilities, (iv) race, religion, language, (v) disability and mental health conditions (the “Protected Characteristics”). [read post]