Search for: "STATE v. STEVENS"
Results 7721 - 7740
of 7,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2007, 7:58 am
.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:25 pm
Then came Booker (argued in the Supreme Court by TChris who writes at TalkLeft) in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
It starts with this notable sentence: "The California sentencing law that the Court strikes down today is indistinguishable in any constitutionally significant respect from the advisory Guidelines scheme that the Court approved in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:04 am
Souter, John Paul Stevens and Clarence Thomas There were two dissenting opinions -- one by Justice Anthony M. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 4:06 pm
The application was 06A678, Coalition to Defender Affirmative Action, et al., v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 6:18 am
Renneisen, Deputy Attorney General; Steven R. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 9:24 am
Souter and John Paul Stevens displayed skepticism about the state court's response in Smith's case. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:48 pm
In other cert-related news: · Justice Stevens concurred in the denial of cert in Josephs v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 9:21 am
Cert was denied in this case, but Justice Stevens issued this clarifying statement: "In Dickerson v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 8:54 am
Justice Antonin Scalia issued a statement respecting the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 7:03 am
Justice Stevens wrote respecting the denial of cert. in Joseph v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 7:15 pm
Perles et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
WEA and Washington v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 1:04 pm
Wednesday's argument in Zuni Public School District No. 89 v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 11:02 am
In response to a question from Justice Stevens, Mr. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 10:44 am
" Steven L. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 10:06 am
Here is the abstract:The United States Supreme Court recently clarified in Lingle v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 6:16 am
Here's the abstract:The United States Supreme Court recently clarified in Lingle v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 11:00 pm
The case is blank">U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
New Jersey lawyer Steven Sanders, who has long been thoughtfully examining the issue of how to deal with Blakely errors, sent me this thoughtful comment about Justice Scalia's curious work yesterday in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
