Search for: "State v Smith"
Results 7721 - 7740
of 11,011
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 3:37 am
§§ 201 et. seq., and related New York state wage and labor laws. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:30 am
In addition, the Supreme Court, in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:42 am
In today’s case (Crane v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:29 am
Read People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:12 am
In Smith v Smith, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 2571089 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.) the Appellate Division affirmed an order which, granted the wife child support and spousal support. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
On Mr B's aplication for a stay until determination of his planning appeal, this did not stand a realistic prospect of success Against the argued precedents of South Buckinghamshire District Council v Smith [2006] EWHC 281 QB, South Cambridgeshire DC v Price [2008] EWHC 1234 (Admin) and Brentwood Borough Council v Ball [2009] EWHC 2433 (QB), where injunctions had been refused pending planning appeals, there was the fact that these all concerned injunction… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
On Mr B's aplication for a stay until determination of his planning appeal, this did not stand a realistic prospect of success Against the argued precedents of South Buckinghamshire District Council v Smith [2006] EWHC 281 QB, South Cambridgeshire DC v Price [2008] EWHC 1234 (Admin) and Brentwood Borough Council v Ball [2009] EWHC 2433 (QB), where injunctions had been refused pending planning appeals, there was the fact that these all concerned injunction… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
There were two pieces of prior art over which the patents were claimed to be obvious: the first was a paper referred to as Parmley & Smith, and the second was a conference paper delivered by Professor Smith (of Parmley & Smith fame) in Banbury. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
Smith & Ors v Ministry of Defence [2011] EWHC 1676 (QB) (30 June 2011): Human rights claims of 6 soldiers killed or injured in Iraq allegedly due to faulty equipment/ poor training struck out following decision in R(Smith) in Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
Siemens (Green Patent Blog) Smith & Wesson – ALJ Rogers sets target date in Certain Muzzle-Loading Firearms (337-TA-777) (ITC Law Blog) Wham-O – FLFMC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 3:50 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
R v Smith, heard 16 June 2011. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 12:08 am
A couple of weeks ago, the Supreme Court ruled in Tapia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
In fact, Smith v Oxfordshire involved the same “Smith” as in this particular case. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:22 am
" Smith v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:08 pm
In 1936, when a Court majority stretched its judicial muscles in Ashwander v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:47 am
Halliburton Co., No. 09-1403; (3) Smith v. [read post]
