Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 7721 - 7740
of 13,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2010, 8:49 pm
Magistrate Harold R. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:43 pm
Prob C § 16010; Schwartz v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm
s digital lock rules (Michael Geist) ‘When copyright Bill C-32 passes, I will automatically become a criminal’ – digital locks (Michael Geist) Business method patents: The state of the art after the Amazon.com decision (IP Osgoode) Chile Heroic victory for action figures – dispute over transformers.cl (IP tango) Europe CJEU considers ‘logistical hub’ for fakes in Nokia hearing: C-495/09 (Class 46) (IPKat) (Afro-IP) EFF calls on European… [read post]
22 May 2017, 5:31 am
See Young v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
In the 1996 case of Romer v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 12:26 am
I have also filed an amicus brief in Martin v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am
Additional documents prepared for the Forum may be accessed here:Provisional agenda and annotations E F S R A CBackground note by the SecretariatE F S R A CConcept note prepared by the Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprisesE F S R A CThe Concept Note Prepared by the Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises (A/HRC/FBHR/2013/3 ) provides in… [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:42 pm
In the case at issue, Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:09 am
Merken BV v Hagelkruis Beheer BV, Case C-149/11 indicates the use needed to support an EU registration, as follows:a) Territorial scope of use is one of the relevant factors;b) It cannot be ruled out that use in a single member state can support an EU registration;c) Use needs to be sufficient or create or maintain a market share;d) No de minimus level of use can be defined.Other factors to consider include the scale and frequency of use, the nature of use, and… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 1:19 pm
Bankruptcy Judge Eduardo V. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:03 am
Stonz Wear, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 8:08 am
IDEA, Section 601(c). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:27 pm
” State v Hoshijo ex rel. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 7:02 pm
C. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
To state the obvious, no emergency exists. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Michael C. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:00 pm
”) At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Brian R. [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:44 am
Maphalle, University of Cape Town (South Africa)· Judicial Protection of Women’s Matrimonial Property Rights in NigeriaAnthony C. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:45 am
The EU court case is C-428/08 Monsanto Technology LLC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
., Defendant.Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-2449-D.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
