Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 7721 - 7740
of 29,298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
’ Martin v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 9:07 pm
District Court focused mainly on what Congress meant nearly eight years ago in its first response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and on what the Supreme Court meant in 2004 in its first ruling in a modern detention case (Hamdi v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 10:55 am
United States: “Let me ask you this question: If we conclude there is a hole in the statute that Congress has to amend, is it more likely that Congress will cure the statute if we rule for you or if we rule against you? [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 6:23 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in California v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:01 am
As the Court noted, Congress expressly stated that “the court” was tasked with deciding certain issues in Sections 502, 503, 504(c), and 505 but omitted the phrase from Section 504(b). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:24 pm
In Rowland v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:18 am
” This statute, like the ones enacted in other states, was interpreted as to allow Medicaid to assert a lien on a recovery up to the amount, regardless of the amount of the recovery which is properly allocable to Medicaid (see, e.g., Baker v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:40 am
Filburn (1942) and United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Delsing v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:54 pm
See Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 4:06 pm
While readers might think that the idea that the military using cyber warfare against the US population is alarmist, we would remind them that kill-switch legislation is never far from debate in the halls of congress. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 7:17 pm
" When Joe and Jane Sixpack (and their elected representatives) are looking for scapegoats, national banks will do just fine.As I said in October 2005, I think the states will continue to lose on these issues "unless Congress changes the law. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Such communications must use the “magic words” articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Buckley v. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 5:10 pm
On Monday, December 4, 2006, Judge Joanna Seybert adopted in part the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Tracy Tomlinson issued only days earlier on November 30 in RX USA Wholesale v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 9:30 am
United States and Smith v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Finding that the City failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the arbitration award should be vacated on the grounds that [1] it was irrational; [2] exhibited a manifest disregard of the law; [3] that the arbitrator had engaged in misconduct or [4] that the award violated public policy, held that Supreme Court had properly granted Union's petition to confirm the arbitration award and had properly denied the City's cross-motion to vacate the award. * See Matter of… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 6:53 am
State of Connecticut Dept. of Educ. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 3:07 am
Neither of the lead opinions in Matal v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Finding that the City failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the arbitration award should be vacated on the grounds that [1] it was irrational; [2] exhibited a manifest disregard of the law; [3] that the arbitrator had engaged in misconduct or [4] that the award violated public policy, held that Supreme Court had properly granted Union's petition to confirm the arbitration award and had properly denied the City's cross-motion to vacate the award. * See Matter of… [read post]
