Search for: "Superior Court of California" Results 7721 - 7740 of 10,170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 3:34 pm by David Kravets
We argued that under California law, the public has a right to see the documents that led San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Clifford V. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:54 pm by Meyers Nave
 Superior Court, carved out an exception for when a trial court would be permitted to vacate an arbitration award. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
We therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals and remand this case for that court, in turn, to remand it to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the merits of Harrison’s juror-misconduct claims and a determination as to whether Harrison is entitled to a new trial. [read post]
9 May 2010, 7:35 am by etoupin
The Central District Los Angeles Superior Court jury revealed their record setting decision last week. [read post]
7 May 2010, 8:22 am by John E. Harding, JD, CFLS
County Superior Court, the 76-year-old King cited irreconcilable differences with the 50-year-old Southwick. [read post]
7 May 2010, 8:11 am by John E. Harding, JD, CFLS
On Tuesday, a judge in Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled that Abbie Dorn's parents have the right to fight for visitation rights on her behalf. [read post]
6 May 2010, 10:10 am by Mitch Jackson
 Mitch also serves as a Judge Pro Tem with the Orange County Superior Court and in his spare time, enjoys Rotary International. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:13 pm by Rick
Of course, when the Revolution starts, California can go fuck itself. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:19 pm by Kim Zetter
Under California law, the public has a right to see the documents that led San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Clifford V. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am by John Bursch
  The Court has already granted cert. for next year involving a California law that prohibits the sale of violent video games to minors. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:37 am by Steven G. Pearl
The Court also held that CSU's adverse administrative findings did not have preclusive effect in a subsequent Superior Court damages action. [read post]