Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 7721 - 7740
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2009, 8:19 am
The must-read SCOTUSBlog alerts us to the following petition for certorari being granted by the United States Supreme Court: Docket: 08-1521 Title: McDonald, et al. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 08-1569 Title: United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
" One of the petitions considered on Tuesday addresses the issue of whether federal judges have the power to release detainees into the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 5:33 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in Samantar v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 12:40 pm
The fact that you get thrown out of the United States forever because the USPS messed up is, well, tough.But Judge Kleinfeld's dissent is a perfect example of a different type of reasoning; in a way, a different type of judging. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
United States Issue: Does 21 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:43 am
Dwight Lundgren, Sister JoAnne Talarico, Trinity United Methodist Church, and United Methodist Church, General Board of Church and Society in Support of Petitioner Brief for J. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
United States Issue: Whether the federal "honest services" fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 2:15 pm
She closed the letter by saying that “the United States is working diligently to find an appropriate place to resettle the remaining Uighur detainees. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:45 am
The Second Circuit’s interpretation of the test focuses “on the nature of the conduct within the United States as it relates to carrying out the alleged fraudulent scheme. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 08-1341 Title: United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Introduction In Part IVA (here) we considered whether the question in Stolt-Nielsen was one for the court or the arbitrators to decide, and predicted that at least five Justices of the United States Supreme Court will hold that the court must decide it. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 5:59 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
Opinion below (11th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States Brief amicus curiae of National Retail Federation Brief amicus curiae of DRI – The Voice of the Defense Bar [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
The United States was not a defendant, nor were the military officers. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:36 am
., decided 6/26/2009) In one man's crusade to invalidate the New York State special investigation units of State Farm, AutoOne and General Assurance Company and otherwise squelch certain investigations of no-fault providers, losses and claims suspected to be fraudulent, this is another battle lost. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:50 am
The term “smuggling” makes it seem as though the immigrant committed a very serious act, but actually, it includes acts such as “encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:50 am
The term “smuggling” makes it seem as though the immigrant committed a very serious act, but actually, it includes acts such as “encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:50 am
The term “smuggling” makes it seem as though the immigrant committed a very serious act, but actually, it includes acts such as “encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law. [read post]
