Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 7741 - 7760 of 48,983
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2020, 4:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's determination denying the separate motions of the appellants appearing separately to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs. * See O'Neil v Peekskill Faculty Assn., 120 AD2d 36 at 42 The decision is posted on the Internet at http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_06090.htm [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 4:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's determination denying the separate motions of the appellants appearing separately to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs. * See O'Neil v Peekskill Faculty Assn., 120 AD2d 36 at 42 The decision is posted on the Internet at http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_06090.htm [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
As noted by Justice Perram in the Capic v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:21 pm by Simon Gibbs
Many readers will recall the case of GSD Law Ltd v Wardman & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 2144. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 8:33 am by Dennis Crouch
His evidence went only to show the cost of the whole mop, and the price at which it was sold. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 5:53 am by INFORRM
A costs and case managment hearing in the case will take place at 2.30 today before Master Kaye. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 11:17 pm by Molly Adams
  Information about your capital needs and those of your children (eg the cost of a new house, replacement furniture etc). [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As I shall explain, any assessment of the relative costs and benefits of these and other proposals depends crucially on what exactly one thinks the problem is.Defining the ProblemMost Democrats see the current problem as one of what legal scholars Joseph Fishkin and David Pozen term “asymmetrical constitutional hardball. [read post]