Search for: "D. J." Results 7741 - 7760 of 23,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2022, 5:58 am by David Pocklington
The Tribunal is satisfied that in respect of allegations (B), (F), (H), and (J),  one member dissenting as to allegations (F) and (J), the Respondent’s conduct was  unbecoming to the office and work of a clerk in Holy Orders, in that he provoked and  offended the Jewish community, and, in the case of allegation (H), his conduct was unbecoming, in that he engaged in antisemitic activity, all within section 8(1)(d) of  the Clergy Discipline Measure.… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm by PJ Blount
(j) The amendments made by this section shall take effect on April 1, 2011. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:38 am
  Pav-Lak and Zurich argued that by not timely asserting that deductible in a disclaimer letter, Arch waived its right to rely on that deductible in accordance with Insurance Law § 3420(d). [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Cette réalité n’est pas nouvelle puisque la population du Québec a déjà fait ce genre de choix dès le début de la Confédération en acceptant d’adhérer à celle-ci. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 8:56 am by NL
Sun Street Properties Ltd v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 72 (Dec) [no transcript available yet]Or, what the hell is going on about Occupy/Bank of Ideas and the property owned by Union Bank of Switzerland. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:33 pm
Para a Quarta Turma do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ), o caráter da cooperativa, de sociedade simples, não lhe dá direitos similares aos de associações ou sindicatos. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:32 am by randal shaheen
L'Oreal USA, a case where plaintiff alleged that the defendants marketed lipstick as “safe for use” when it contained dangerous amounts of lead, on the grounds that, in that case, there was “no allegation that the presence of lead in lipstick ha[d] any observable economic consequences. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm by Dave
The parting shot was to say that this was a defence which genuinely disputed the claim on grounds which appear to be substantial, within CPR 55.8, and the matter should be remitted to the county court for directions for trial on the point.There were some other relatively trivial points raised at the last minute by Counsel for Ms Whittaker which were all rejected by Bean J (and rightly so, I’d say).It will be interesting to see if this case goes further. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 2:41 am by Rechtsanwalt
Er wurde einer Richterin in Düsseldorf vorgeführt, die einen Haftbefehl wegen Mordverdachts erließ. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 10:33 pm by Josh Blackman
If you'd like a copy, please e-mail me: josh-at-josh-blackman-dot-com. [read post]