Search for: "In Re L." Results 7741 - 7760 of 22,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2008, 4:19 am
One could say it was "strained" to rule for Applicant, rather than constrained.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:00 am
In re Farouk Systems, Inc., Serial No. 78646723 (June 19, 2008) [not precedential].The Board observed that a mark is deceptive under Section 2(a) if (1) the term misdescribes the character, quality, function, composition, or use of the goods, (2) prospective purchasers are likely to believe that the misdescription actually describes the goods, and (3) the misdescription is likely to affect the purchasing decision.Applicant did not clarify whether its goods contain silk (it said it… [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 5:48 pm
"The Board therefore extracted the refusal to register from the PTO's jaw.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
In re Right-On Co., Ltd., Serial No. 79011373 (March 31, 2008) [not precedential].The Board, not surprisingly, found the word HONEYSUCKLE to be the dominant portion of the registered mark. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:58 am by John L. Welch
"And so the Board ruled that Applicant did not meet its burden of proof, and the Board affirmed the refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
14 May 2007, 4:40 am
In re Team Worldwide Corp., Serial No. 76430485 (March 15, 2007) [not precedential].The Board found the marks to be "very similar" in overall appearance, identical in sound, and the same in meaning. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 9:48 pm
But, on second thought, as a minority shareholder in CAAFlog, I am going to re-post the comment--with some additional food for thought--as a post.I find this whole Haditha issue an interesting play on the politics of America. [read post]