Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 8,589
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
Alan Gura, who successfully argued the landmark Supreme Court gun case District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
Essex Trading Standards v Wallati Singh [2009] EWHC 520 (Admin) is a Divisional Court (England and Wales) decision from 3 March which the IPKat nearly missed completely. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 7:23 am
Finally, Shizuka Abe & On-Kwok Lai turn to the age-old question of ageing. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 7:52 am
Hampton v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
Reynolds and Altria in Gelep v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 1:01 am
iStock_000000100546_L2.jpg The First Circuit explains the circumstances in which an undercover agent may give lay testimony "as to the meaning of code words or phrases" concerning drug quantities based on the agent's "undercover drug buys"; noting as one factor whether the witness's lay testimony "corresponds" to undisputed facts, in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 3:14 am
Subramanium v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 8:26 am
By Eric Goldman People v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:11 pm
“The ‘Dawn Donut rule,’ arising from Dawn Donut Company, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 5:35 pm
Situation Management Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:56 am
The proposed rule is intended to lay a factual foundation for resolving the national debate on federal strategies for controlling anthropogenic sources of GHGs. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:01 pm
Under the Massachusetts v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:44 am
(Truth be told, the court did a nice job of laying out the preemption background.) [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:22 am
" The Star says that "by permitting lay juries to second-guess the FDA's decisions on what options doctors should have available in administering prescription drugs, the Supreme Court's decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 8:55 am
., on March 3 had filed a motion to file a supplemental brief in Caperton v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
In short, not a whole lot on the subject recently.That's likely to change, so we thought we'd stay ahead of the curve and provide our readers with the lay of the land. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 9:40 am
Goldberg In State of California v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:54 am
Supreme Court in the now-infamous eminent domain case Kelo v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 10:18 am
See YCA, LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 9:23 am
Alright, so in terms of case law on this area, the one that we’ll put on the show notes is the Sopinka v. [read post]
